1984 Citroen CX vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1984 Citroen CX. (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 121 kg more than 1984 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Citroen CX. (301 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Citroen CX. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1984 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1984 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen CX | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
Model | CX | ATS |
Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1409 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1805 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2775 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 61 L |