1984 Citroen CX vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen CX would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1984 Citroen CX. (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 775 kg more than 1984 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota 4Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Toyota 4Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (377 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Citroen CX. (301 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Citroen CX. 2013 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1984 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1984 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen CX | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | CX | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 377 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1409 kg | 2184 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 87 L |