1984 Citroen Eco 2000 vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1984 Citroen Eco 2000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1984 Citroen Eco 2000. (35 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen Eco 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 636 kg more than 1984 Citroen Eco 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Citroen Eco 2000 | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Eco 2000 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 750 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 480 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4620 mm |
