1984 Citroen GSA vs. 1976 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1984 Citroen GSA is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Zastava 1300 (59 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1984 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1984 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Citroen GSA | 1976 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | GSA | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2430 mm |
