1984 Citroen GSA vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,798 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TL-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1984 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TL-50 weights approximately 377 kg more than 1984 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Citroen GSA | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | GSA | TL-50 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1302 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 37 L |
