1984 Citroen GSA vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1984 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 795 kg more than 1984 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Citroen GSA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Citroen GSA | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | GSA | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3270 mm |
