1984 Citroen GSA vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1984 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1984 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Citroen GSA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen GSA | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | GSA | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 93 L |