1984 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 930 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp (451 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1984 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | De Tomaso | Zastava |
Model | Longchamp | 102 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 451 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2160 mm |