1984 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp (451 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1984 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
1984 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | De Tomaso | Mitsubishi |
Model | Longchamp | FTO |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 451 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1300 mm |