1984 Dodge 600 vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1984 Dodge 600 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1984 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge 600.
Because 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (172 Nm @ 4 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge 600 | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | 600 | Celeste |
Year Released | 1984 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2350 mm |