1984 Dodge 600 vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Dodge 600 (142 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2003 MG ZT. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Dodge 600 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 250 kg more than 1984 Dodge 600.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (300 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge 600. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge 600 | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | 600 | ZT |
Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |