1984 Dodge 600 vs. 2009 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (141 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1984 Dodge 600. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 685 kg more than 1984 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Dodge 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (330 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge 600. (158 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge 600 | 2009 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | 600 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 158 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2990 mm |