1984 Dodge 600 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1984 Dodge 600. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge 600.
Because 2012 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge 600. (228 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge 600 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | 600 | UTE |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |