1984 Dodge 600 vs. 2012 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2012 Lotus Evora is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1984 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge 600.
Because 2012 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Lotus Evora (349 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge 600 | 2012 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | 600 | Evora |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2576 mm |