1984 Dodge Charger vs. 2003 Ford Puma

To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Puma (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Dodge Charger weights approximately 12 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Puma (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge Charger.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Dodge Charger 2003 Ford Puma
Make Dodge Ford
Model Charger Puma
Year Released 1984 2003
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1591 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 62 HP 99 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6150 RPM
Torque 117 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 1038 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2450 mm