1984 Dodge Colt vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1984 Dodge Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Dodge Colt (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (75 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Dodge Colt weights approximately 160 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Dodge Colt (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (101 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1984 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Dodge Colt | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Dodge | Opel |
| Model | Colt | Ascona |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |
