1984 Dodge Colt vs. 1996 Rover 800
To start off, 1996 Rover 800 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 800 (174 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Colt. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 800 should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 800 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1984 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 800 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge Colt. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge Colt | 1996 Rover 800 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Colt | 800 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2780 mm |