1984 Dodge Colt vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Dodge Colt (87 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Dodge Colt weights approximately 210 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Dodge Colt (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (114 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1984 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge Colt | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Colt | Clio |
Year Released | 1984 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 114 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2480 mm |