1984 Dodge Colt vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 181 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Colt. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 288 kg more than 1984 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Dodge Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (381 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge Colt. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge Colt | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Colt | XC90 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1438 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2720 mm |