1984 Dodge Colt vs. 2006 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Colt. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1706 kg more than 1984 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 329 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge Colt. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge Colt | 2006 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Colt | E-350 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 475 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3510 mm |