1984 Dodge Conquest vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1984 Dodge Conquest is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Dodge Conquest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Dodge Conquest (143 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Conquest should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Dodge Conquest weights approximately 850 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Conquest, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Dodge Conquest | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Conquest | Elan |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2240 mm |
