1984 Dodge Conquest vs. 1982 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1984 Dodge Conquest is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Dodge Conquest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Dodge Conquest (143 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1982 Dodge Omni. (64 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Conquest should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge Omni. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Dodge Conquest weights approximately 280 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Dodge Conquest (251 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge Omni. (115 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1984 Dodge Conquest will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge Conquest | 1982 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Conquest | Omni |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2530 mm |