1984 Dodge Conquest vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Conquest would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Dodge Conquest is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Dodge Conquest weights approximately 180 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Conquest, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Dodge Conquest | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Conquest | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1989 |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1910 mm |
