1984 Dodge Lancer vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1984 Dodge Lancer is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 95 kg more than 1984 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Dodge Lancer | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
| Model | Lancer | XK |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2600 mm |
