1984 Dodge Lancer vs. 1964 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1984 Dodge Lancer is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Dodge Lancer (143 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Dodge Lancer weights approximately 170 kg more than 1964 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge Lancer | 1964 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Dodge | Isuzu |
Model | Lancer | Minx |
Year Released | 1984 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2440 mm |