1984 Dodge Lancer vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 270 kg more than 1984 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Dodge Lancer | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Lancer | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |
