1984 Dodge Lancer vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (302 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1215 kg more than 1984 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Dodge Lancer | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Lancer | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 6801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2415 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3510 mm |
