1984 Dodge Lancer vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (403 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (143 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1984 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Dodge Lancer | 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Lancer | C 112 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 403 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |
