1984 Dodge Lancer vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1315 kg more than 1984 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Dodge Lancer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Dodge Lancer | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
| Model | Lancer | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2890 mm |
