1984 Dodge Lancer vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 381 kg more than 1984 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Dodge Lancer | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Lancer | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1581 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2930 mm |
