1984 Dodge Lancer vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Dodge Lancer (143 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge Lancer | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
Model | Lancer | Polo |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2470 mm |