1984 Dodge Lancer vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (143 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 802 kg more than 1984 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Dodge Lancer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Dodge Lancer | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
| Model | Lancer | XF |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2053 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2909 mm |
