1984 Ferrari 328 GTB vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ferrari 328 GTB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ferrari 328 GTB would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ferrari 328 GTB (238 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2009 Volvo S40. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ferrari 328 GTB should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo S40.
Because 1984 Ferrari 328 GTB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ferrari 328 GTB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ferrari 328 GTB (260 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo S40. (170 Nm). This means 1984 Ferrari 328 GTB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo S40. 2009 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1984 Ferrari 328 GTB has manual transmission. 1984 Ferrari 328 GTB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ferrari 328 GTB | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Ferrari | Volvo |
Model | 328 GTB | S40 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1850 cc | 2435 cc |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |