1984 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1984 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 460 kg more than 1984 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Fiat Ritmo | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Fiat | Studebaker |
Model | Ritmo | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1984 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2980 mm |