1984 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1984 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Cougar (129 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 440 kg more than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Fiat Ritmo | 1967 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | Ritmo | Cougar |
Year Released | 1984 | 1967 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |