1984 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 910 kg more than 1984 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Fiat Ritmo | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ritmo | Challenger |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2730 mm |