1984 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2003 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2003 Toyota Mark II is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Mark II (156 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 650 kg more than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Fiat Ritmo | 2003 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Ritmo | Mark II |
Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 156 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |