1984 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2010 GMC Acadia is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Acadia (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Acadia weights approximately 1302 kg more than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Acadia (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. (86 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Fiat | GMC |
Model | Ritmo | Acadia |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 86 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5098 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1986 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3020 mm |