1984 Ford Capri vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Capri would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ford Capri weights approximately 55 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1984 Ford Capri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford Capri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Ford Capri | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Capri | Clio |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |
