1984 Ford Falcon vs. 2001 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2001 Mazda Tribute is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Falcon (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Mazda Tribute. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 411 kg more than 1984 Ford Falcon.
Because 2001 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda Tribute (271 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Falcon. (240 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Falcon | 2001 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | Tribute |
Year Released | 1984 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 271 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2630 mm |