1984 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Rover 75

To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1984 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ford Falcon weights approximately 4 kg more than 2006 Rover 75.

Because 1984 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 240 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Ford Falcon 2006 Rover 75
Make Ford Rover
Model Falcon 75
Year Released 1984 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3273 cc 2495 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 120 HP 175 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 2300 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1374 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2750 mm