1984 Ford Falcon vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Falcon (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Renault Megane. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Megane.
Because 1984 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Falcon (240 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Falcon | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | Megane |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |