1984 Ford Fiesta vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Fiesta | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fiesta | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 957 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2430 mm |