1984 Ford Fiesta vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Fiesta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Fiesta (96 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Fiesta should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 160 kg more than 1984 Ford Fiesta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Fiesta (132 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Fiesta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Fiesta | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fiesta | Puma |
Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1387 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2450 mm |