1984 Ford Granada vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1984 Ford Granada is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1984 Ford Granada. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ford Granada weights approximately 105 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Granada. (151 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Ford Granada | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Granada | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1993 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 151 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2700 mm |
