1984 Ford Granada vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Granada would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Tribute (240 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1984 Ford Granada. (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 305 kg more than 1984 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1984 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda Tribute (302 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Granada. (119 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Granada. 2010 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1984 Ford Granada has manual transmission. 1984 Ford Granada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: