1984 Ford GT vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford GT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 115 kg more than 1984 Ford GT.
Because 1984 Ford GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (260 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford GT. (203 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford GT.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford GT | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | GT | Roadster |
Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2467 mm |