1984 Ford Laser vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Laser would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1984 Ford Laser. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Laser.
Because 2009 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Laser. (120 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Laser | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Laser | Commodore |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |