1984 Ford Mustang vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 1984 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1984 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue has automatic transmission and 1984 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1984 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Mustang | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Mustang | Camargue |
Year Released | 1984 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3050 mm |