1984 Ford Mustang vs. 1978 Lancia A 112
To start off, 1984 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 2,292 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ford Mustang weights approximately 530 kg more than 1978 Lancia A 112.
Because 1984 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Ford Mustang | 1978 Lancia A 112 | |
| Make | Ford | Lancia |
| Model | Mustang | A 112 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 903 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 655 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2040 mm |
